Observation
So, I was watching Jon Stewart's the Daily Show and this woman from the WAPO was hawking her book about partisan politics.
- Why is it I never heard about partisan politics when Democrats were in control?
- The premise was the partisan politics is a direct result of the one thing Democrats and Republicans can agree on drawing districts the preserve incumbents.
- Now having said this she states that a politician can say what ever the want and get away with it because the people of the district think the same way.
- She then says we need to end this incumbence control so we can get a Congress that is more representative of the American people.
- Look at point 3 and then point 4.
- As for point 3, don't the people want a politician the is like them to accurately reflect the views of that individual constituency.
- As for point 4, maybe Congress does not reflect the authors view of what she believes is representative of American people. She is after all a reporter that knows it all and does not have to leave the beltway to gage what Americans rely want in a politician.
- It is interesting that when the media takes polls it is done on a national scale, yet, Congress is chosen based on individual districts that have their own concerns different from a national consensus. Thus, what the WAPO author believes is the view point of the American general population coud be different based on individual district concerns.
1 Comments:
Labeling one a "politician" is not a compliment.
Post a Comment
<< Home